The difference between dofollow and nofollow backlinks is the link qualification in the HTML.

A regular link needs no special rel value. People commonly call it a dofollow link. A nofollow link includes rel="nofollow", which tells Google that the publisher would rather Google not associate the two sites or crawl the destination from that link.

Here is the practical comparison:

Link type Typical HTML What it communicates
Dofollow <a href="https://example.com">Source</a> An ordinary, unqualified link
Nofollow <a href="https://example.com" rel="nofollow">Source</a> The publisher does not want to endorse the association or crawling through that link
Sponsored <a href="https://example.com" rel="sponsored">Partner</a> The link is part of advertising, sponsorship, or another paid placement
UGC <a href="https://example.com" rel="ugc">Comment</a> The link comes from user-generated content

A followed link may contribute more directly to link-based SEO signals. A nofollow link can still send qualified visitors, expose a brand to the right audience, lead to other citations, and help people discover a useful source. Neither label guarantees rankings, traffic, indexing, or business results.

Want a repeatable way to earn relevant editorial links? Start building backlinks with DofollowBack.

“Dofollow” is shorthand, not an HTML attribute

There is no rel="dofollow" value that a publisher must add.

An ordinary link is simply an anchor with an href:

<a href="https://example.com/research">Read the research</a>

Google's official link qualification guidance says regular links that it can fetch and parse without qualifications do not need a rel attribute.

This matters when auditing backlinks. A tool may label an ordinary link “dofollow,” “followed,” or “follow.” Those labels normally mean that the crawler did not find a qualifying value such as nofollow, sponsored, or ugc on the anchor.

Do not add rel="dofollow" to your own links. It does not turn a weak placement into a strong one. Link relevance, page quality, destination fit, accessibility, and editorial context still matter.

What a nofollow backlink means

A nofollow backlink contains this value:

<a href="https://example.com" rel="nofollow">Example</a>

Google says publishers can use nofollow when the more specific values do not apply and they would rather Google not associate their site with, or crawl the linked page from, their site.

That wording is narrower than several common claims.

A nofollow link does not mean:

  • the destination is automatically untrustworthy
  • no person can click the link
  • the destination cannot be indexed
  • the page cannot be discovered elsewhere
  • the mention has no marketing value
  • the publisher secretly penalized the destination

Google also notes that a linked page can be discovered through other links or a sitemap. Nofollow is a link qualification, not a guaranteed way to keep a destination out of search.

If you control the destination and want to prevent indexing, use the appropriate indexing controls on that page. Do not rely on a backlink's nofollow value.

Do nofollow backlinks help SEO?

They can help the broader search program, but you should not report them as if they were ordinary followed links.

A nofollow backlink can produce useful outcomes:

  1. Referral traffic. Readers can still follow the link to your page.
  2. Audience exposure. A relevant mention can put your brand in front of people who need the resource.
  3. Secondary discovery. A journalist, researcher, or creator may find the source and cite it elsewhere.
  4. Brand search demand. A visible mention may cause readers to search for the company or author later.
  5. Source validation. A link can let readers inspect the evidence behind a claim, regardless of its attribute.

These are possible outcomes, not guarantees. Verify them with referral data, assisted conversions, new mentions, and subsequent links.

For link reporting, keep followed and nofollow links in separate columns. That avoids overstating acquisition results while preserving evidence of real audience value.

Are dofollow backlinks always better?

No.

A followed backlink is usually more relevant when the objective is to earn an editorial citation that search engines can evaluate without a link qualification. But the attribute alone does not establish quality.

Compare these two placements:

  • A followed link hidden on an unrelated, unmaintained page created to sell links
  • A nofollow citation in a trusted industry publication that sends qualified readers to original research

The first has the preferred attribute but weak editorial and audience signals. The second may not be counted the same way by link-analysis tools, yet it can still produce discovery, traffic, credibility with readers, and future citations.

The right question is not “Is it dofollow?”

Ask:

  • Is the linking page relevant to the destination?
  • Does the link support a real claim or reader action?
  • Can search crawlers and users access the page?
  • Is the page indexed or otherwise discoverable?
  • Is the placement editorial, paid, or user-generated?
  • Does the anchor and surrounding copy describe the destination accurately?
  • Does the link send useful referral traffic?
  • Would you still want the mention if authority metrics did not exist?

A followed link that fails these checks is not rescued by its attribute.

When publishers should use sponsored or UGC instead

Nofollow is not the only way to qualify a link.

Use rel="sponsored" for paid placements

Google recommends sponsored for advertisements, sponsorships, and other paid placements.

Examples include:

  • paid advertorial links
  • sponsored newsletter links
  • affiliate links created as part of compensation
  • links included because money, products, or services changed hands

The commercial relationship should also be disclosed clearly to readers. The rel value is not a substitute for an understandable disclosure.

Use rel="ugc" for user-generated links

Google recommends ugc for links inside user-generated content such as forum posts and comments.

This lets the publisher distinguish a link posted by a user from one selected by the editorial team.

Values can be combined

A link can contain more than one value:

<a href="https://example.com" rel="ugc nofollow">Community resource</a>

When inspecting a backlink, record every rel token rather than forcing the result into only “dofollow” or “nofollow.”

How to check whether a backlink is dofollow or nofollow

Inspect the rendered link, not a screenshot or sales claim.

Method 1: Inspect the anchor in the browser

  1. Open the exact page containing the backlink.
  2. Find the visible link.
  3. Right-click it and choose Inspect.
  4. Locate the surrounding <a> element.
  5. Confirm the href points to the expected destination.
  6. Read the complete rel attribute, if present.

Examples:

<a href="https://your-site.com/guide">Guide</a>

This is an ordinary link commonly described as dofollow.

<a href="https://your-site.com/guide" rel="nofollow">Guide</a>

This is nofollow.

<a href="https://your-site.com/guide" rel="sponsored nofollow">Guide</a>

This is a paid link with both sponsored and nofollow qualifications.

Method 2: Check the rendered DOM and destination

Page source can differ from the rendered DOM when JavaScript inserts or changes links. Inspect the live element when possible.

Also verify:

  • the link is visible to normal users
  • the destination returns a successful response
  • the link does not pass through an unexpected redirect
  • the canonical destination is the page you intended to promote
  • the anchor is not inside an inaccessible or login-only area
  • the page is not a fabricated copy created only for the link

A backlink checker is useful for monitoring at scale. Manual inspection is still necessary before reporting an important placement as verified.

Why link tools can disagree

Two crawlers can report different attributes or status for the same backlink.

Common reasons include:

  • One crawler saw an older page version.
  • JavaScript changed the rendered link.
  • The publisher updated the rel value after publication.
  • A consent wall or login prevented one crawler from seeing the page.
  • The link redirects differently by location or device.
  • One tool reports domain-level data while another reports the exact page.
  • The linking page was removed between crawls.

Record the observation date and exact referring URL. If the placement matters, keep a copy of the relevant HTML evidence in your internal campaign record. Recheck it later because links can change.

How to evaluate a backlink without chasing the label

Use a simple scorecard.

Check Good evidence Warning sign
Relevance The page and destination solve connected problems The topics are unrelated
Editorial reason The link supports a claim, example, tool, or next step The link exists only because it was purchased or exchanged
Page quality Original, maintained content with a real audience Scraped or mass-produced pages
Accessibility Public page and working destination Login wall, broken page, or redirect chain
Attribute Correctly reflects the relationship Paid link presented as independent editorial endorsement
Traffic Qualified visits or engagement No evidence anyone reaches the page
Durability Stable URL and active publisher Temporary page with no maintenance

Then classify the outcome honestly:

  • Followed editorial backlink
  • Nofollow editorial citation
  • Sponsored placement
  • User-generated link
  • Unverified or inaccessible link

This reporting is more useful than calling every live URL a backlink win.

Should you ask a publisher to remove nofollow?

Usually, no.

The publisher controls its outbound-link policy. If the page accurately cites your source and the qualification reflects the relationship, pressuring an editor to change the attribute can damage a legitimate placement.

Ask for a correction only when there is a factual or technical problem, such as:

  • the destination URL is broken
  • the link points to the wrong source
  • the anchor misidentifies the company or research
  • a migration created an unnecessary redirect
  • the relationship was classified incorrectly and the publisher agrees

Do not offer payment, reciprocal links, products, or favors in exchange for removing a qualification. If compensation exists, the publisher should disclose and qualify the link appropriately.

Build a balanced backlink profile through useful sources

Do not set a target such as “100% dofollow.” It encourages teams to reject real mentions and pursue artificial placements chosen only for an HTML attribute.

A healthier process is:

  1. Publish a page with a specific reason to cite it.
  2. Identify publishers whose readers need that source.
  3. Pitch the exact evidence or tool, not a generic link request.
  4. Let the publisher make the editorial and link-treatment decision.
  5. Verify the live page, destination, and attributes.
  6. Measure followed links, qualified referrals, secondary citations, and conversions separately.
  7. Recheck important links for removals or changes.

If a useful link disappears or points to a retired URL, follow a verified link reclamation process. If a site mentions your research without ever linking to it, use an unlinked brand mention workflow. Those are different tasks and should stay separate in your campaign data.

The bottom line

Dofollow backlinks are ordinary links without a qualifying rel value. Nofollow backlinks use rel="nofollow" to qualify the relationship and how Google should treat the link.

A followed editorial link is usually the clearer link-building outcome. A relevant nofollow citation can still reach readers and support discovery. Judge both by the page, context, audience, destination, and real results. Do not judge the placement by one attribute alone.

Research notes

  • Ahrefs Keywords Explorer approved queue snapshot, Google US database: primary keyword volume 100, Keyword Difficulty 12, parent topic “do nofollow links help seo.” No traffic-potential figure was stored for this queue item.
  • Google Search Central, “Qualify your outbound links to Google,” reviewed for regular links and the nofollow, sponsored, and ugc values.
  • Google results were requested for the primary keyword on August 1, 2026 UTC, but automated access returned a verification block. Bing and Yahoo fallbacks were also degraded. The explicit comparison query and primary documentation support a focused comparison article. No replacement keyword metrics were used.